Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkow, Bradford
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T19:18:57Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T19:18:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.issn1467-8284
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl-handle-net.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/1721.1/125851
dc.descriptionFor a symposium on Objective Becoming in Analysis Reviews.
dc.description.abstractDoes time pass? Well of course it does. Iconoclasts and gadflies might deny it, but (as my parents used to say) they’re just looking for negative attention. It is therefore frustrating to be told, as I have been, that one’s theory of time is false because it leaves out the passage of time. In a way, Objective Becoming (Skow 2015) is a defense of the theory I prefer against this accusation. That theory is the block universe theory of time.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/analys/anx153en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleReplies to Cameron, Wilson, and Leiningeren_US
dc.title.alternativeSummary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skowen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSkow, Bradford. "Summary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skow." Analysis 78, 1 (January 2018): 93-96 ©2018 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.relation.journalAnalysisen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-11-06T13:48:40Z
dspace.date.submission2019-11-06T13:48:42Z
mit.journal.volume78en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record