dc.contributor.author | Skow, Bradford | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-17T19:18:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-17T19:18:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-8284 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl-handle-net.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/1721.1/125851 | |
dc.description | For a symposium on Objective Becoming in Analysis Reviews. | |
dc.description.abstract | Does time pass? Well of course it does. Iconoclasts and gadflies might deny it, but (as my parents used to say) they’re just looking for negative attention. It is therefore frustrating to be told, as I have been, that one’s theory of time is false because it leaves out the passage of time. In a way, Objective Becoming (Skow 2015) is a defense of the theory I prefer against this accusation. That theory is the block universe theory of time. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1093/analys/anx153 | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.source | MIT web domain | en_US |
dc.title | Replies to Cameron, Wilson, and Leininger | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Summary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skow | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Skow, Bradford. "Summary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skow." Analysis 78, 1 (January 2018): 93-96 ©2018 Author(s) | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Analysis | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2019-11-06T13:48:40Z | |
dspace.date.submission | 2019-11-06T13:48:42Z | |
mit.journal.volume | 78 | en_US |
mit.journal.issue | 1 | en_US |
mit.metadata.status | Complete | |